Blurb's Photography Book Now Contest

Yay for Blurb's Photography Book Now contest. The grand prize is $25,000.  Darius Himes is the lead judge and more will be announced soon I presume.

To enter:

If you have already made your photography book through Blurb, simply follow the Blurb-specific directions on our Entry page. This can be done completely online, no need to send us a physical copy of your book.

If you have self-published your photography book outside of Blurb, you’ll need to send us one physical copy of each book you enter for judging purposes. Here is the PDF entry form.

If you need to make a photography book in order to enter, we recommend starting at Blurb.

The competition closes on Thursday, July 14, 2011 at 3:00 p.m. PDT (22:00 GMT).

The Problem Isn't Photo "Spammers"

A few days ago, a creative director with an axe to grind threw up a poorly conceived website aimed at stopping what he calls "photo spammers". He named specific photographers who he claimed were guilty of being "spammers" because they had sent unsolicited e-promos. He, along with a handful of other creative directors (note: no art buyers signed the list) pledged to not hire these blacklisted photographers. The photo blogosphere lit up (see aphotoeditor.com and mediabistro.com), with people pointing blame at certain photographers, reps, database products like Agency Access and Adbase and email marketing products like MyEmma and Mailchimp.  Said creative director claims he was just trying to start a conversation about a system which is broken.Well he certainly got people talking, but not very constructively.

What nobody seems to be mentioning is that the problem is not the fault of any one party. The problem lies in the fact that there are just too many photographers trying to make a living doing what they love and not enough jobs to go around.

The barriers to entry into the profession continues to dwindle. Technology has made it very easy to make good looking pictures. iPhone photos are winning World Press Photo and being published in Martha Stewart and The New Yorker.  (I'm not saying all you need is an iPhone to be a good photographer... of course you have to have a good eye and a sense for what makes a compelling image). Technology won't slow down, so this is a given that we have to accept.

And at the same time that it is getting easier and cheaper to make great pictures, there are fewer ways to make a decent living doing it. This has been argued to death on other sites and I won't go too much into it. But it's important to admit that the pie is getting smaller and there are a lot more people wanting a slice.

Staff changes at the places that hire photographers have made it so that art buyers, photo editors and creative directors are responsible for a bigger workload than ever before. So they have even less time to be sifting through e-promos, yet the amount they are getting is at an all time high.

Not to mention the erosion of copyright and the licensing model...

To say the system of self-promotion is broken is too simplistic. A well thought out and well-targeted marketing plan that uses a combination of producing new work, sending print promos, e-promos/newsletters, social networking, in-person networking and following up is still essential.

My advice for photographers: DO NOT send any kind of promo (print or email) to someone who does not work on projects that you are right for. For magazines, this should be pretty easy. Just go to the newsstand and look at them.  When pitching to art buyers, make sure you know what accounts that agency is working on. If you can't name what a certain creative on your list does, then you probably shouldn't be marketing to them. This takes a lot of discipline and research time but it is very important.

Also, make sure you are complying with the CAN-SPAM act, which requires you to include a physical address and an unsubscribe link in every email.

And most importantly, make it a priority to increase awareness of your work through non-promotional means. Create new bodies of work or personal projects at lease once a year. Share your work with others, start an event in your town, put together a DIY exhibition, print limited edition books, participate in the online photo community, attend festivals, do portfolio reviews. Get offline and concentrate on creating and sharing and creatives will learn about you in a way that feels more genuine than any promo could.

My advice for creatives who feel inundated with unwanted promos: Feel the pain of the photographers who are trying to get jobs. You get paid a salary, they do not. Their agents only make money when their photographers make money. Think of the silver lining, that you have people who value what you do enough to spend time and money promoting themselves to you. And use that unsubscribe button.

 

 

PDN Interviews JWT Art Buyer about Self-Promos

PDN has an ongoing series called "Promos I Kept" where they interview creatives about what self-promo pieces are effective. The most recent installment has some really great and solid advice from JWT Director of Art Buying Shawn Smith. To read the whole piece you must have a subscriber log in. If you don't already have a subscription to PDN, you need one. On email promos:

Shawn Smith: I get tons of them, at least 50 a day, especially on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays—it’s an insane amount. The problem is that I open and read 90 percent of my e-mails on a Blackberry so if you are sending me images in an e-mail, chances are I won’t see them.

The best e-mails are very focused, event-driven announcements about a show or a new book that’s coming, things of that nature. Keep in mind that creatives are not constantly looking for photographers, we’re doing our other job too.

On personal projects:

I think it’s really important for photographers to be working on series and stories and sequences, rather than just single images.

On print promos:

I really like when people send photo series, show announcements, book announcements, etc. I also love to receive small books, though I do understand that cost can become a big issue when doing these types of piece.

Interesting bit about all of the email promos coming in on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays. I advise photographers to send emails on Tuesday or Wednesday, because the data consistently shows that those get the better open rates. But if everyone is sending on those days, it will become overwhelming for the client to even begin to look through all those emails.

Best advice: only send out an epromo when you actually have something to say. Don't just send one when you have a new picture to show off. If there is something interesting or newsworthy in your promo, you have a much better chance of the buyer reading it and clicking on a link.

In Praise of AFAR Magazine

Can we just talk about how gorgeous AFAR Magazine is? I was stuck at the airport for a couple of hours and flipped through as many magazines as I could. I'm a little late chiming in on the lovefest (it's been named the best travel magazine by pretty much everyone) but I am smitten. AFAR really stands out on the newsstand. Photo editor Tara Guertin uses photojournalistic travel photography to convey a true sense of what it's like to immerse oneself in another culture.  Destinations still appear pretty and desirable, but they seem real and approachable.  And unlike a lot of other travel photojournalism, there were none of those visual cliches that clutter the genre (wide eyed children gaping at the camera, abandoned buildings, etc). They even use stock photography in a way that makes the images seem fresh and new (a grid of bridges around the world comes to mind).

Here are some of my favorite images from the March/April 2011 issue:

 

The "Postcards" section in the front also features great images on the photojournalism end of the spectrum.

 

Interested in contributing to AFAR? These writer's guidelines should be helpful to photographers too.

Photographers with Cool Print Promos, Keep an Eye on this contest

I'm always looking for inspiration for print promos for photographers, and the For Print Only blog is one of my favorite destinations (along with noplasticsleeves.com and the PDN Self-Promo Awards galleries. So I was very excited to see that they are going to announce a FPO contest soon. I can't wait to see the winners, and I hope that you photographers out there who have worked with designers on cool print promos enter.

From FPO

On Monday April 4 we will launch the call for entries for the inaugural FPO Awards, celebrating the best print work from around the world during 2010. It will be open to design professionals, students, printers, and hobbyists as long as the work has been produced in a minimum quantity of 50.

Judges (really amazing group!), categories, and fees will be announced then.

---

Fotofest 2012 Biennial Deadline is next week

from fotofest.org The FotoFest 2012 Biennial takes place March 16 - April 23, 2012.

The FotoFest 2012 Biennial will be looking at Contemporary Russia.

FotoFest’s own exhibition will focus on Contemporary Russian Photography: Post World War II Avant-garde Photography to the Present. These exhibitions will show work by Russian photographers working in Russia. The theme will be explored through five photography, video and multi-media exhibitions of work by contemporary Russian artists. FotoFest’s Creative Directors are collaborating with two Russian curators on these exhibitions.

In addition to FotoFest’s own exhibitions, numerous Participating Spaces in the Biennial look at work that artists send to FotoFest for consideration. These spaces have the option of 1) following FotoFest’s focus which in 2012, can include work about Contemporary Russia by artists of any nationality, or 2) presenting work unrelated to FotoFest’s theme.

Participating Spaces are the over 100 galleries, non-profit spaces, and commercial venues in the Houston area that choose to exhibit photography during the FotoFest Biennial alongside FotoFest’s own exhibitions. Participating Spaces may take a more varied and open-ended approach to what they will exhibit for the Biennial. Some spaces will follow the Biennial focus, others will not. On average, ten Participating Spaces create exhibitions based on portfolios seen on the FotoFest submission web page. Submissions Process

FotoFest curators will be doing their own studio research in Russia for its own exhibitions, but we are happy to consider submissions sent by Russian photographers for this purpose.

For Participating Spaces, FotoFest shows submissions on a special website to Participating Spaces possible exhibition by them during the Biennial. As stated above, these works can be about Contemporary Russia by artists of any nationality or work unrelated to FotoFest’s Russian Theme.

The submissions guidelines are listed below. FotoFest art staff reviews all submissions which are then shown to the FotoFest Art Board for review. Submissions approved by the Art Board are posted on the submission web page for Participating Spaces to view and select for possible exhibition.

Deadline: Friday, April 1, 2011 (at the FotoFest office)

To have your portfolio reviewed by the FotoFest, please send:

* A CD or DVD containing no more than 25 high quality digital images (JPEG) * A short statement about your work * A current resume or curiculum vitae

Materials will not be returned

Please note:

* The FotoFest staff reviews portfolios on a monthly basis. * Digital images must be sized to 1000 px at their longest dimension. * Digital files that do not follow these specifications will not be considered. * No more than 25 images will be reviewed. Supporting text can be saved on CD/DVD. * Due to the volume of materials that FotoFest receives, submissions will be reviewed in the order in which they are received. * Responses may take up to several months. Please be patient and DO NOT contact FotoFest regarding the status of your portfolio. We appreciate your patience. * FotoFest does not review portfolios sent via email.

Please address work to: FotoFest 2012 Biennial - SUBMISSIONS Attn: Exhibitions 1113 Vine Street, Ste 101 Houston, TX 77002 U.S.A.

Please contact FotoFest Exhibitions Coordinator Jennifer Ward with any questions – exhibits@fotofest.org

Palm Springs Portfolio Review Registration is Open

I'll be reviewing portfolios in Palm Springs as part of the Palm Springs Photo Festival. There are some great seminars and workshops planned as well.

Some business & marketing highlights:

HOW TO IDENTIFY CLIENTS, BRING IN NEW BUSINESS & NEVER BE REJECTED with Maria Piscopo

SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING: Putting Facebook, Twitter & Linked-in to Work for You with Frederick V. Johnson.

PRICING & NEGOTIATING STRATEGIES FOR COMMERCIAL PHOTOGRAPHERS: Getting Your Money with Maria Piscopo

HOW TO GET YOUR PHOTO BOOK PUBLISHED with Michelle Dunn Marsh and others

Blurb Presents: The PHOTOGRAPHIC BOOK: Editing, Sequencing, Designing, Producing and Marketing Your Work In Print

AN INTRODUCTION TO MARKETING YOUR PHOTOGRAPHS with Mary Virginia Swanson

More info at http://connect.palmspringsphotofestival.com/connect-2011/

***

Don't forget to read up on how to make the most of a portfolio review.

Self-Promo Round Table (Part 3 of 3)

It's the last of my three part series on what creatives love and hate when it comes to photographers' self promos. Hope you have found it helpful so far. Today we get the dish from people in the marketing and advertising world. If you missed the previous installments please check them out. Monday was editorial and Tuesday was entertainment.

Today's panelists are:

Sandy Boss Febbo, Executive Art Producer, Carmichael Lynch

I receive dozens of mail promos and an average of one hundred email promos daily.  For me, it's all about the image.  Period.  It's that simple, and that hard.  The image must be compelling enough to get my attention and with the vast talent producing and promoting their work - standing out is a big deal.  But they do.  It can be as simple as a postcard with a single strong image or an email blast with a similarly simple format - that's all it takes.  I've received more elaborate pieces from photographers that feature a strong body of work - a published book, set of postcards, blurb book, etc., as well as a several pieces recently from agents and artist collectives that are stunning.

[nggallery id=4]

Of these Just Add Water and Giant are certainly worth mentioning.  The first was a great collection of folded posters with a range of work from each of their artists and the latter a bound book with again a range of work from each of their artists. In both cases, again, the quality of the imagery was the hook.

My only pet peeve is overly designed promotions. It's about the image, not the package, the extras, or investment.  I would rather see a simple promo than one where the imagery becomes secondary or lost.  I also cringe when a promo isn't recyclable.

Just Add Water promo specs:

designer - Rinse Off Wallace

printer - Capitol Press (www.capitolpress.com)

quantity - 1500

Giant Artists specs:

Designers: Megan Steinman & Eric Roinestad

Printer: Oceanic Graphic Printing

Quantity Mailed Out:1,000

Elise Robins, Senior Print Producer, Publicis West The type of self promos that I have kept and generally hold onto for longer periods of time are ones that are beautifully printed and have something very unique about them.  The images selected to be show cased on the piece are obviously extremely important, but almost as important is the presentation.   The promo piece does not have to be particularly expensive, but it needs to stand out.

This can be done with "show stopping" photography that is unusual or dramatic.  But it can also be done by formatting the piece differently.  I believe that the presentation of the piece also shows the originality of the photographer and I particularly like those pieces that are cut differently, folded differently, printed on a unique stock or with a unique technique. I also like to see more than one image displayed in these pieces so that I can get a sense of the photographer's style which is not always easy from one shot.  The key takeaway is an emotionally moving picture on a unique platform.

I have no real pet peeves when it comes to photographers marketing themselves other than the frequency of their communications.  I think hearing from a photographer 3-4 times per year is adequate.  Having my mailbox cluttered with promotional pieces each week and sometimes the same promotional piece is overwhelming and not appreciated.  I realize that in a digital age, this is a weird thing to say, but I actually prefer to receive promos in the printed form versus electronic.  Printed pieces seem to have more impact and evoke more emotion than an email.

I think the only place for more elaborate promos is during a portfolio showing.  I definitely gravitate toward well made books and ones that are more unique.  One photographer showcased his work using a scrapbook theme which allowed him to show a variety of work in an unusual way that stuck with me.  Along with books, the leave behinds at portfolio shows are usually more elaborate and that feels good to me, as if I am part of a select audience that is important enough to get those special promo pieces.

Prentice Howe, SVP, Executive Creative Director, Door Number 3

I get bombarded by photographers' mailers. Most of them are postcards or simple fold-out pieces. With so many hitting my desk, it's hard to tell them apart. Honestly, most go straight to the recycling bin. The ones that really stand out? They have a killer image that just begs to be stared at.

I love when photographers pick an interesting topic and then deliver a photographic narrative around that. The more interesting the topic, the better. Rather than just sending beautiful shots from a scenic coastline, they're actually digging in and telling a story through their shots and showing many different sides of their skill sets along the way. It shows creativity and the ability to tell a story through the lens. Those kinds of pieces get passed around the creative department the most.

[nggallery id=2]

One photographer who always sends beautiful, well designed mailers is Dana Neibert. He sent an incredible book a while back, printed on very tactile paper with hand stitched binding.

Dana designed his book himself. Printed by Neyenesch in San Diego. Quantity 7,500 (!)

Jon Setzen, Creative Director, Something Massive LA

The best promo pieces for me are always the most simple. When you get numerous promo pieces a week the last thing you want to do is follow instructions to see a photographer's work. I once had to do a paint by numbers sort of exercise to see a photograph of NYC at dusk. I also never understood the corporate gift sort of promos - matchbooks, calendars etc. I understand why it's nice to have something to use and reuse, but for me I only ever saved things I thought were well designed. Recently I have kept promos from Amanda Marsalis (samples of newest promo below), Jim Franco and Kang Kim.

[nggallery id=5]

I always open envelopes and when you have to open an envelope your attention is always fully given to what is inside. When sending out my own promo pieces in the past I've always hand-written the addresses. People will generally open a hand-written envelope before a machine printed one. If you put a postcard with a short hand-written note in an envelope, it will get looked at and read. I would argue that your website (which hopefully appears prominently on the back of the card) will most likely be visited.

This definitely requires more work, but it's better to spend the time writing the note and addressing the envelope then it is trying to figure out which photo will look best on the mass-produced journal you're thinking about sending out. Work with a designer to think about layout and typography on the back of your card. If you have a logo (which you really should) have a custom stamp made and use that as your return address. Custom stamps cost about $30. It makes you look organized and invested in yourself and your brand.

Blair Thompson, Creative Director, Believe in

Being in the position of hiring photographers for projects, I am contacted fairly regularly. This can manifest itself in many forms. No particular medium has a better chance of attracting my attention. The main, and most obvious, distinction between those that succeed and those that fail is that they understand our visual direction and approach. We should be targeted because the photographer feels there is a 'good fit' and that their creativity 'mirrors' ours. Failing to understand this and subjecting me to irrelevant and unconsidered marketing is wasting both or time and money.

Ultimately we are most impressed by the work. That speaks loudest. Your capabilities and experience are all important but nothing speaks more loudly that the pictures! How it is presented is not necessarily the issue as long as it is confident and resonates with us. Usually this is most likely if the photographer is creative and resourceful and is not afraid to take risks — much like ourselves.

Focusing on particular mediums of delivery — here are my thoughts:

Digital Brilliant on the side of the photographer in terms of tracking and monitoring click throughs etc. But easy on the side of the recipient to ignore or intend to revisit — and never does. This approach requires considered design and imagery, working in harmony to cut above the sheer level of mail an average recipient gets on a daily basis and create an impression. Clicking through is step one. Having a site which then fully satisfies the users interest is what will make the biggest difference of all.

I am also a fan of the 'this is what I've been up to' email route. It's honest and allows the recipient to feel a privileged view into the photographers world. A bit like a blog but less frequent and again highly considered. It definitely provides a strong opportunity for building positive brand awareness. Don't overdo it though — there are still limits which border on annoying. About every 6 weeks is good.

Print A simple and creative approach works best here. Don't spend fortunes on elaborate brochures. Go with something which is cost effective and easy to replace with newer or targeted content. Think about what your customer is likely to best respond to. Also think responsibly in terms of the materials you print on and the lifespan of your materials. Beautiful images and design will stand a greater chance of being retained for longer — or even passed on, which is ultimately what you are looking for.

General Show your best work and try not to show everything and anything. Focus on what you do best or what you want to do more of. You will appear confident and professional and more likely to command a decent fee as a result.

Contributor Bios

Sandy Boss Febbo is the Executive Art Producer at Carmichael Lynch in Minneapolis where she has produced for a great range of clients for over fourteen years. Sandy has a degree in Art History and English Literature. Her background includes time with the Minnesota State Arts Board and she has volunteered as a docent at the Walker Art Center for over fifteen years.

Elise Robins: Born and raised in the suburbs of Chicago Graduated from Illinois State University with a BA in Marketing Graduated from Depaul University with an MBA in Marketing Management Has worked in the advertising industry for about 18 years Currently lives in Seattle with her husband Interests are reading and travel

Blair Thomson is Creative Director of independent design and branding agency Believe in. Established in 1996 Believe in exist to articulate engaging, provocative and effective brand experiences driven by ideas and solid research. They push boundaries and exploit possibilities, working in partnership with ambitious clients to realize the full potential of their brands. Experience encompasses branding, identity, print, packaging, illustration, art direction, digital, advertising and environment.

Prentice Howe is the head visionary and trailblazer at Door Number 3 in Austin, responsible for leading the indie ad agency’s creative team while playing an integral part in the overall company operations. As Executive Creative Director, Prentice supervises all art direction and copywriting, while developing strategic campaigns that communicate a brand’s truth to a desired audience.

Jon Setzen is the Creative Director of Something Massive, an interactive advertising agency with offices in LA, NYC and Buenos Aires. His personal work has appeared in numerous magazines, blogs and rock posters have been exhibited worldwide including London, Tokyo, Copenhagen, NYC and LA. He lives and works in Los Angeles where he also runs the Los Angeles chapter of Creative Mornings.

Self-Promo Round Table - Part 2 of 3

Today's self-promo round table panelists are from the entertainment industry:

If you missed yesterday's post from the editorial/magazine world, please check it out.

Wednesday I'll post feedback from ad agency creatives.

Leah Overstreet, Photography Director, Spike TV

I work at a guy’s network, so its great when promos come in that are geared toward the type of work we are doing. I make sure and hold onto these for reference for upcoming shoots that we have. Its very important to make sure and tailor your work towards your client and the type of work they are doing.

I receive so many emails each day and lots of times email promos get lost in the shuffle. If you send me a promo through the mail, I am 10 times more likely to see it and hold onto it, then an email.

scottmcdermott

scottmcdermott

I love this promo by Scott McDermott because it is not a pretty portrait. It shows all of the grit and imperfections in the skin, face, and hands. The contrast of the black and white backgrounds really make it stand out. It's a 6 x 8.5" card and is printed on thicker stock paper.

I also really like a recent promo I received from EJ Camp. It is 6x8.5. This promo is made of a thicker stock paper, with a photo finish. Its a great advertising shot and right in line with the work that we do. It made me want to look at her website and see more of what she does. I usually think that one or two images per promo card should be the max, however I think this is a good example of a series that works well using more images.

ejcamp2

ejcamp2

Put your strongest work on your promo that will drive the potential client to your site.

Maggie Fost, Art Director, Merge Records

I am more likely to keep a single postcard than anything more elaborate because if it's an inspiring image or something that just makes me smile, I'll pin it up on my bulletin board, which spans a full wall of my office and is filled with all kinds of images and objects. That said, an email that is specifically written to me (rather than crafted for mass distribution) is probably the most compelling kind of promotion. Knowing that someone is eager to work with Merge makes me more likely to file their email in my "photographers" folder than someone sending images of their recent work every quarter. If they include their location in the subject line, it's easier for me to find when I go back looking for a photographer in a certain city or region.

Another way I learn about photographers is by asking someone whose business it is to be in the know, like Jasmine (this is the straight dope - she did not ask me to say this!) For a recent project, I needed an L.A.-based photographer who had a sun-drenched dreamy style. Rather than googling away or sifting through my e-archives, I sent a quick email to Jasmine and she pointed me directly to the perfect person. It turns out this photographer had sent me promos in the past, but I ignored them because they weren't relevant to my needs at the time.

I also learn of photographers through our bands. If they want to work with someone specific for promotional shots or an album cover, we almost always honor that. If I like the results, we are likely to use that photographer again, so making connections with the subjects photographers are interested in shooting is just as important as marketing to the client.

Gail Marowitz, Creative Director, Roadrunner Records

The promos that I tend to keep are of two types:

The first promo has an image that directly speaks to what I do and my needs as a creative director for a Rock Music record label. It can have a portrait of a band in an interesting location, it can have a musician that looks comfortable and that properly telegraphs the sensibility of the recording artist. It can also be a still life or an illustrated photo collage that is dark, edgy and well executed.

The other promos that I keep are those of the extremely well designed nature. They have beautiful typography, interesting paper selection and are conceptually solid. These are the promos that assure me that the photographer has a good eye and cares about his/her work from concept to final output.

I do have pet peeves.

  • Do a little homework before blindly sending promos. If you send me still lifes of lipstick and flowers or women doing yoga, or children or beautiful fashion models, I will delete and/or throw away and not go to your website. I work for a Rock/Heavy Metal label. Try to send me appropriate work for what I do.

  • If you still go the snail mail route, make sure your promo is well designed and printed well.

  • Don't send me an email promo every week. I know there is a way for you to check if I found your promo interesting enough to look at your website. If I haven't checked your site, and you keep sending me promos (I receive approximately 20 of them a DAY), I will get annoyed. You don't want that.

What I appreciate the MOST, is when I meet a photographer who is talented, look at their book, explain my needs and in the following week or two, they have put together and sent me a body of work that captures the essence of what we talked about in our meeting.

Simon Keeping, Art Director, Kraken Opus

I receive a fair few printed promos from photographers. Its always nice to look at but in terms of referring back to them later I'm not sure I actually do. In the course of the publishing projects I work on there's alot of paper on my desk, flatplans, editorial plans, proofs, print samples etc etc so I normally lose them within that pile of paper or failing that it gets 'filed' somewhere safe which I then forget about.

I much prefer e-promo's which are easily forwarded to editors (when it comes to commissioning), other team members or even fellow designers and most of which I think represent photographers better than a printed flyer as the quality of the images is never compromised by poor printing.

One thing I find very irritating is when I take the time to click through to a site to check out a photographers work it can be at times a battle to just look at the images. A word of advice, If you direct me to your site, I don't want to see loads of flash animation and over designed navigation, I want to see the quality of your work. Keep your site clean and functional other wise people will just get frustrated and give up trying to view your work. Remember what the function of your site is: a tool for art directors (very busy people) to see your photography. I'd rather see the worlds most basic website which allowed me to quickly view your work and get a feel for your style (with easy to find up-to-date contact details) than an all singing, all dancing web extravaganza. Remember your site is often the first point of contact with clients, don't miss out on work because of it!

Contributor Bios

Gail Marowitz has been art directing and designing for the music business for nearly twenty years. She has worked for various labels including Tommy Boy Records, the Imago Recording Company, Wind-Up Records and Columbia Records where she was the Design Director for ten years collaborating with artists such as James Taylor, Patti Smith and Bette Midler. In 2006, she won a Grammy® Award for "Best Recording Package" for Aimee Mann's "The Forgotten Arm" and was nominated in the same category again in 2008 for Mann's latest release "@#%&*! Smilers". Her work has been selected for Print Magazine's Regional Design Annual and she was a recipient of a Silver Telly Award in 2008. Currently, she is the Creative Director at Roadrunner Records, a label whose stock in trade is mostly hard rock and heavy metal. You can see her personal work at www.thevisualstrategist.com

Maggie Fost is the Art Director at Merge Records, an independent record label in Durham, North Carolina.

Leah Overstreet began her career photographing for the Smithsonian National Zoo in DC. After moving to New York she worked in the photo departments of GQ, Vogue, and Men’s Journal Magazines. Leah is currently the photo director for Spike TV/TV Land and a freelance photographer.

Simon Keeping is a freelance art director, currently working with Kraken Opus who specialize in high end, limited edition books. He has recently art directed 5 titles for such luminaries as Ferrari, Deigo Maradona and Tottenham Hotspur. Influenced by music, design, illustration, fashion, photography and reading too many skateboard magazines as a teenager, he describes his style of work as ‘clean, stylish and bold’.

Self-Promo Likes (and Pet Peeves)... From the People You're Sending Them To (Part 1 of 3)

1.png

Just to drive everyone nuts, I've been talking to photo editors and creative directors about what sort of promos they like enough to keep. As you hopefully know, most of the print promos they receive go straight into the recycling bin (and most e-promos aren't opened). What makes a promo stand out enough to get pinned up on the wall of chosen ones? What promos get forwarded to the other creatives? What turns people off?d And why should this drive you nuts? Well, as with anything creative, it's highly subjective. Ask 5 different people, get 5 different answers. That said, there are some common themes throughout. Everyone agrees that overly gimmicky promos can't make up for mediocre images. There's also some consensus that personal project images make the more interesting promos.

Over the next three days I'll be posting creatives' thoughts. Today's installment is magazine photo editors. Tomorrow check back for opinions from the entertainment industry (record labels, TV and book publishers). Wednesday will feature ad agency creatives.

Today's panel:

Rebecca Crumley, Director of Photography, The Knot "I’ll peek at the promos as I walk from my mailbox to my desk. But honestly, 99% of the time, they go straight to the recycling bin. I’d rather see an updated blog to convey the current work. This way, I know a photographer is actively shooting, staying on top of their business, and get a better sense of his or her personality. I also work in a different manner than most photo editors; I’m seeking existing images from which we’ll produce editorial content. So this ties into taking time to send promos to creative professionals of relevance to your work and of applicable needs."

Sacha Lecca, Senior Photo Editor, Rolling Stone

[nggallery id=1]

DSREPS late last year (i think) sent out a large oversized set of images by Deborah Schwartz's amazing roster of talent (see pictures of the promo in action). It certainly made an impression getting such a large set of promos. My favorite in the bunch: Fucking Flies On My Wedding Day by Jason Nocito. www.dsreps.com | www.jasonnocito.com

Cole Barash is a photographer whose work I've been checking out for a few years. The promo card itself is very simple. Simply designed promos stand out to me where logos, slogans, unnecessary graphics on a promo card can distract. I was able to work with Cole this year when he shot surfer Clay Marzo for us, which was great. www.colebarash.com

Mark Murrmann's day job is photo editor of Mother Jones magazine and he  is also a talented photographer. We sort of got introduced recently and he sent me his card. His live music work is great. www.markmurrmann.com

Giant Artists very recently sent out a beautifully printed book showcasing the artists they represent. I'm a big fan of Giant Artists and their roster so this is an obvious keeper. www.giantartists.com

...speaking of printed books, pamphlets or zines, Phil Jackson, is a documentary photographer out of Philly largely shooting his fellow skaters, every once in a while puts out a small zine. www.philjacksonphoto.com

...also, just this week I got a booklet by Eric Kayne featuring his work on the band Arcade Fire (-ed. note of full disclosure: I produced this promo). I like the pics though some of the design elements take away from some of the shots. (ie the white vertical lines cutting into them.) (-ed. note: fair enough!) www.erickayne.com

Alex Lake/Stem Agency: I met with a rep from Stem Agency and this card was one of their leave behinds, a photo by Alex Lake of Florence Welsh of Florence and the Machine. It's such a gorgeous image feeling more like a cinematic film still. www.stemagency.com

Brenda Milis, Director of Photography, Men's Health

I very much like to get promos in the mail since I check each piece of mail every day. I am much more likely to miss emails: I may open an email and get a call or have someone walk into my office and completely forget about it, having never truly looked at it. That promo mailer, in contrast, is sitting right in front of me on my desk. I feel very strongly that not a lot of money needs to go into making a good, impactful photo promotion. I think it’s important to include more than one (and hopefully several) images in your promo, be that on one card or several pieces/cards. If it’s just one great shot I might not get as strong of a sense of your shooting style, your range, and in fact you may have just gotten lucky shooting one great image!

I am really turned off by overly clever, overly produced promos that I receive (and more about that in my discussion of promo 2, below). Please have the confidence in your images to let them speak for themselves. I don’t need to make a keychain out of your promos, nor a luggage tag for that matter. Also, I really want to be able to recycle your entire promo if and when I get rid of it. I don’t want a lot of plastics and doo dads that are bad for the environment and add to waste. Our industry is wasteful enough as it is.

1. Angie Smith Was not aware of Angie’s work until I got this promo book which is in the form of a notebook. It’s lovely and clearly wasn’t inexpensive to produce. Redux reps her and produced the promo. If Angie had sent me a single card with 3 or 4 images on it, I would have been just as happy.

Designer: http://silasdilworth.com/

Printer: Paperchase.net

2. Joseph Escamilla Wow -- I almost never took the time to open this promo. It’s a good example of overdoing it: This came as a package in a clear plastic wrapping. It was hard to make out the images because of the stuff that was attached to the images themselves. The base of package was the anatomical head figure, mostly covered with what looked like key chain tags.

The promo card was part of the package as well. The star of this promo was the stuff included which basically obscured the images which I really quite like. Very intriguing and unique imagery of artifacts which we may be able to use for stories about medically-related topics, etc.

In sum, a very annoying promo that I’m glad I took the time to open and unpack in order to see the photos. I wish that the photographer had just sent me promo cards -- would have been happier and he could have saved a lot of money.

Promo Specs:

The promo was a collaboration between Rachel Ma (helloraye.com) and Joseph, with prior identity and branding having been done by Owen Gee (nicelyobserved.com). Most of the components were straight out of office supply stores, all the printed material was done in small 500 print runs by uprinting.com. 5 4x6 4/4 offset postcards.  And 100 8x10 digital prints.  Everything else such as labels and personal notes were all done on his laser printer. Joseph created 100 promos and have mailed about 40.

3. Dorothy Hong Dorothy Hong's promo cards show an intimacy, a freshness, and youthfulness that is lovely and I'm looking for the right assignment for her. She sent me a packet with 3 cards, each one had one image on it.

Promo Specs:

Designer: Dorothy designed them herself with a template she created years ago, just dropping in new photos each time Printer: overnightprints.com Print run: 1,000 total (4 different photos, single sided 4x6 postcards, 250 each) Distribution List: Mailed all 4 out in 1 envelope, to 250 people. So every envelope contained 4 separate, different photos. 4. Hollis Bennett This is a simple tri-fold mailer promo with three images on the inside and his name, website, contact info on the back. Gorgeous, medium format pix---could use for travel, documentary. Simultaneously lovely (which makes me happy) and yet appropriate for a men's mag (which makes me happy).

Promo Specs:

5,000+ emails 6 times a year through Agency Access Designed by Hollis and printed by Nashville-based Jive! printers. Print run around 350 tri-fold cards.

Molly Roberts, Director of Photography, Smithsonian

IMG_0849(2)

IMG_0849(2)

I live with photographer promos surrounding me and keeping me company during my work day. I recently changed my wall and posted an image by Alex Masi. Prompted by his postcard to check out his work, I found out that he had photographed the Buddhas of Bamiyan earlier and was heading back to that area. This led to my assigning Alex for a feature in the December 2010 issue of Smithsonian.

Although I love having some of these postcards and prints around me, I also lament the waste as over 70 % probably end up in the recycling bin. I prefer digital mailers at this point for conservation purposes.

Allyson Torrisi, Director of Photography, Popular Mechanics "I think the simpler the promo the better. I have a prejudice that the more elaborate the promo , the more it is to make up for talent. Great talent will stand out on a single postcard with two images. The goal is to drive me to your website to see your work. It is more important to to have great work. Invest your time and energy into test shots, collaborating with friends. Shoot a personal story, that tells me more about who you are than a vellum envelope."

Contributor Bios

Rebecca Crumley is one of the industry's leading experts in wedding photography and style. In her role as Weddings Photo Director at The Knot, she is responsible for producing hundreds of Real Wedding stories featured each year in The Knot Inc. media properties through managing thousands of wedding photography submissions. Her daily interaction with photography also predicts trend forecasting and industry insight.

Sacha Lecca is a Senior Photo Editor at Rolling Stone, with over 16 years' experience in magazine publishing, including stints at Newsweek and CMP Media.

Brenda Milis began working with photography as an art historian, receiving her B.A. at UC Berkeley and studying photo history on fellowship in the graduate division of Northwestern University. Getting her start in photo editing at Jane magazine, Brenda eventually helped launch Style.com, then moved to Santa Fe, NM to work as a photo editor at Outside magazine. She is currently the Director of Photography at Men's Health magazine. Shoots she has produced have won awards and been featured in American Photography, SPD and the PDN photo annual.

Molly Roberts has been working in the newspaper and magazine biz for 30 years. She is  currently Photography Editor at Smithsonian Magazine.

For more inspiration, feedback and contradictory opinions about self promos, check out these resources:

Rob Haggart's APhotoEditor.com archive is a treasure trove of self-promo write ups.

PDN hosts an annual self-promo contest. You can browse the winners galleries by year for lots of inspiration and some ideas for graphic designers and printers to contact (when that info is listed which it isn't always...)

The No Plastic Sleeves blog is all about great promos and portfolios. Tons of inspiration.

Teaser: Self Promo Roundtable in 3 Parts

A little teaser for the weekend. On Monday I'll be posting the first of three installments of interviews with various creatives who receive a lot of self promo pieces. We'll be talking about their likes, dislikes and major pet peeves. E-promos vs. print. Envelope vs. no envelope. Simple vs. complex. You'll read candidly honest opinions from:

...plus maybe a few more.

I'll also be featuring galleries showing specific examples of promos people loved enough to keep.

See you here on Monday!

Photographers Doing it for Themselves, but at What Cost?

In the new economy and media landscape, there are a lot of cant's. Photographers can't wait for funding, can't expect a traditional media outlet to publish their work, can't rely on portfolio viewings to lead to work. They are expected to be constantly blogging, tweeting, tumblring, producing online magazines, creating iPad apps and tapping their social networks for funding. The thinking is that your increased online presence will generate money for you because you will be part of the conversation and on the radar of the people who are hiring. Or, that people will pay you directly to consume your work in the form of a self-published book or magazine. But at what cost?

Too Many Hats Syndrome

Today the British Journal of Photography posted a story titled "Do it Yourself". BJP talks about Rob Hornstra's Sochi Project, a massive undertaking chronicling the area where the next Winter Olympics will be held. Since no media outlets would pay to do something on such a grand scale, Hornstra was left to fund the project himself.

But as Hornstra points out, “You’re not just a photographer any more, you’re an entire company,” he says. “You handle the marketing, the sales, budgeting. You handle everything. You have to make people aware of the story."

How do all of these new demands on photographers affect the actual photography? Are you a good marketer? Do you enjoy trying to get people to buy ad space on your site? If you are undertaking a large project, it will probably involve a team of people. Do you want to spend your time project managing the endeavor? If you do, that is fab, but if you don't, don't feel the pressure just because it is what everyone is doing. Better to do one thing really well than to do 20 things half-ass.

Time Suck Effect

Recently, Manjari Sharma's Shower Series ended up on lots of blogs, which led to an ad job shooting faucets. Sharma was interviewed about the project and the gig it led to, and one thing she mentions in most interviews is that she reads all of the photo blogs in order to stay current. I commend her, as that is practically a full-time job. It's great to have the pulse of the industry and to know what your colleagues are working on. And I love that her project got blogged about so much and that led to a commercial job. It's what we all want for the industry.

But I worry that there is too much pressure and emphasis put on being part of the blogversation. If you find that you are spending more time staying current on photo blogs than actually shooting, coming up with new project ideas, editing work or collaborating with colleagues, then it's time to reevaluate how valuable all the blogging is.

Maybe I Should Shoot More Like...

You also want to be wary of having your style influenced. Just because everyone is blogging about hazy, barren seascapes this week or abandoned schoolhouses or whatever doesn't mean that you should do that or that doing so will lead to internet fame and glory.

As they say on Project Runway, stay true to who you are as an artist. Have a point of view. Don't muddle that view with too many outside influences.

There is something to be said for unplugging, literally and figuratively.

And Now for some Good News...

I love photo essays. I started my career pitching stories to magazines back in the days when editors would actually say yes and the story would appear a few weeks later in print. I think there is nothing like the power of a large-scale photo project to tell a story. I firmly believe that regular people who don't care a thing about photojournalism can have their minds expanded and their views changed by seeing an amazing photo essay.

I love that there are so many new avenues for photography. I just hope they reach a wider audience beyond those who a) love photography or b) are interested in the issues being covered by photojournalists. The power of traditional media lies in its reach.

I also love that blogs, online magazines and other self-publishing avenues have allowed photographers to research other people's work more efficiently. Now there are no excuses for doing a project that has been done to death already.

Get online and see if your idea is original. Then get offline and go shoot. And don't forget to tweet about what you ate for lunch that day.

Read more about crowdfunding: I recently wrote about how Erin Siegal used Kickstarter to fund her project. PDN's August cover story about Jason Florio talked at length about crowdfunding and the many outlets photographers can pursue. Tomas van Houtryve recently posted about beta testing flattr.

Get some self-publishing inspiration: VII has launched the VII Magazine in order to be a media outlet as well as content creator. Former GEO editor Tina Ahrens and acclaimed photojournalist Karim ben Khalifa launched emphas.is, an online portal for photojournalism that will use crowdfunding and micropayment to sustain itself. Magnum's David Alan Harvey has turned burn magazine into a portal for student work, workshops, contests, and more.

iPhone 4 Camera White Balance Drama

I've just returned from the Apple store with my 2nd iPhone 4.  I returned my first one because the auto white balance in the camera wasn't working, and I read online many stories from other people about having similar problems.  It took talking to 3 different people at the Apple store before someone would just take the first phone back and give me a new one. Well unfortunately, the replacement phone is just as bad as the first (if not worse). The "geniuses" at the Apple store tried to tell me that a yellow cast is totally normal because of tungsten light.  I explained to them that I understand that different light sources have different temperatures but that the white balance is much, much worse than with the 3Gs.  (Please don't try and lecture a photo major about light!)

Here are side by side comparisons showing pictures taken with the iPhone 4 and the 3Gs.  Can you guess which is which?

I'm trying to decide if I will go back and try for a third. I know they're going to give me a hard time, and try to make me feel like this is a totally normal thing for the camera. From my online sleuthing, I've learned that some people do finally get a phone that doesn't do this, but it may take up to six exchanges!

Unfortunately you can't replicate the problem in an Apple store because they don't have the right lights. So I'm going to bring a small lamp with me and show them for myself. I'm not going to leave the store til I get one that works right, and if I can't find one that works right, I'm going back to my old phone.

Stay tuned ;)

Are you having the same problem? You're not alone:

http://macgroup.org/blog/2010/08/09/iphone-4-looks-do-matter/

http://discussions.info.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2482991&start=0&tstart=0

iPad Portfolio vs Printed Portfolio

Over at APhotoEditor.com, creatives are weighing in on if print portfolios still matter. Like with almost anything related to marketing yourself as a photographer, ask three people and you get three different answers. One person says yes you have to still have a print book, another says they haven't called in a print book in over a year. The one thing they all agree on: be prepared for any situation. My question isn't so much about having a print book vs not having one. I wonder more -- if you're going all digital -- what are you showing on your iPad that can't be shown online? What experience are you giving the creative that she can't get by just going to your website?

Consider this. If you're dropping off/shipping your iPad: Just like print portfolios, they have to be delivered, where they take up room on the creative's desk, and then the person has to take time to make sure they get returned to the messenger center or mail room.

If you're looking for an in-person meeting, are you delivering a richer experience on your iPad than they could get by going to your website? I can't tell you how many times I've had to tell photographers that rolling up to a meeting just to show off your website or some folders of images on your desktop is not going to cut it. Aside from the novelty of having someone flick through your on-screen portfolio, are you offering much more than your website does?

Don't get me wrong, I think the iPad is iRad, I just don't want photographers to abandon the process of making print portfolios if they end of doing themselves a disservice by annoying a potential hirer.

I'm sure there are some fab examples out there of killer iPad portfolios and I want to see them! :)

Q&A with Erin Siegal: Tapping Social Networks to Fund Investigative Journalism

In a previous post I talked about how journalists and artists can raise money to cover projects through crowd funding.  Erin Siegal, a photographer, multimedia artist and journalist has been working on a story on corruption in the Guatemalan adoption industry. She used kickstarter.com to raise the money necessary to finish the story. Below is a Q&A with her about the process and why she didn't go the traditional route.

You've been working on Finding Fernanda for over two years. Did you start out thinking it would be a photo essay? If so, was your goal to get it published online or in a magazine?

I fell into the world of adoption corruption entirely by accident, and as a result of being a photographer. My sister and I went to Guatemala on vacation in

December 2007. While waiting for our plane in the Guatemala City airport, we were surrounded by Americans leaving with newly adopted children. On a visual level, it was a very striking scene because of the trans-racial element as well as the sheer number of children leaving. I was immediately curious to learn about what was happening. I decided to do a little research to see if there was a story angle I could pitch to my photo agency, Redux Pictures.

Back in the States, I started reading all the English language clips I could find about Guatemalan adoptions. To my surprise, many of the stories focused on issues of corruption like kidnapping, baby-selling, and bribery. There were numerous clips from 2005-2007, and when I watched the six-part Dateline special "To Catch a Baby Broker," my curiosity was piqued. I just didn't understand how the abuses could keep occurring, apparently over and over again. Where was the oversight? Was the US government turning a blind eye to proven child trafficking?

When I thought about how to photograph the story, it seemed like an immense amount of time and reporting was needed. How else could I start to understand corruption that possibly was rooted in organized crime? I'd also been creeping towards a point in my photo work where I wanted to explore multi-faceted, complex human-rights based issues that couldn't be told with just pictures. I wanted to write the text to go with my photographs. The problem was that I didn't know how, or where, to start.

Columbia University offers a Master's degree in journalism with an investigative specialization, the Stabile Center for Investigative Journalism. The Stabile Center takes about 12 students each year. The application requires a pitch for a year-long thesis investigation, so I proposed an examination into the political side of international adoption. Who was calling the shots, and why? What purpose did a lack of oversight serve?

In August 2008, I started as a Stabile fellow and my life became engulfed in adoption fraud. It was a fascinatingly gray subject, with no black or white. A few months after starting my research, I came across the poignant, incredible story of Betsy Emanuel and Mildred Alvarado, the two mothers whose stories are detailed in Finding Fernanda. I was able to spend a month living in Guatemala City generously funded by the Stabile Center in January 2009, and have returned since, paying my own way.

At first, I imagined pitching to Rolling Stone or Harper's. Yet boiling it down to 3,000 words seemed like a disservice. Hundreds of people (including sources who need anonymity for security reasons) talked to me, and I wanted to honor their trust and faith. A book made sense, though I didn't initially set out to write one. The story simply demanded it.

Did you approach any publications, foundations or NGOs about funding the story?

This past January, I immediately started hustling for funding.

The idea of partnering with an NGO crossed my mind, but accepting funding from an advocacy group would obviously damage the credibility of the reporting. The fundraising process hasn't been easy: it's a full-time job to finish reporting and writing a 300-page book in 8 months. Finding the time to apply for grants and awards, learn about marketing/sales, and freelance stories simultaneously is a constant challenge.

In terms of publications, right now I'm working with the New York Times on an adoption-related investigative story. It's a co-bylined feature I'm working on with Ginger Thompson. Since the Times is already one of my photo clients, Ginger and I are angling to have me shoot the story's photos. My photo agency has been getting me work here and there. Unfortunately, there aren't enough hours in the day to be pitching, reporting, writing, and shooting other freelance pieces right now, because of chapter deadlines.

I've also been applying to every grant and foundation I can find! Both the Pulitzer Center for Crisis Reporting and the Fund for Investigative Journalism turned down my original proposals for book support, but I plan to re-apply for the online project component. The Pulitzer Center is so overwhelmed by applicants that they've frozen their program until October to review the backlog of submissions! It's been tough, because I'm up against a crazy amount of laid-off journalists with years and years of experience. I have an ongoing dialogue with a few other grantmakers, and I've come really, really close serious backing- I was one of the finalists for Lowell Bergman's $45,000 Investigative Reporting Project Fellowship at Berkeley, but wasn't selected. I'm currently working on applications for the Alicia Patterson Foundation, among others.

Three funding sources have really come through. The first was Investigative Reporters and Editors (IRE) who awarded me one of two 2010 Freelance Fellowship Awards to support my part-time research assistant, the amazing Fernanda Diaz. Second, the Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism, an amazing non-profit reporting center, has also kicked me $5,000 towards reporting expenses this spring. The third source had been Kickstarter, which has by far been the fastest and easiest way to fundraise. Finding Fernanda met its Kickstarter target of $3,000 in just six days, and I'm hoping to raise at least $5,000 total by August 20th.

Taking on a project like this requires more than a few leaps of faith. Finding Fernanda is a book both necessary and overdue. It's traditional investigative journalism done in the service of the public good, exposing wrongdoing and holding those in power accountable. The broader appeal lies in the compelling experience of two very different women, one Guatemalan and one American, whose lives accidentally intersect because of one little girl: Fernanda.

What benefits, besides the money raised, have you gotten out of opening your story up to funding through Kickstarter?

Crowd-sourcing has definitely helped raise the profile of the book. People now know why I've been off the radar for so long. Kickstarter also enables more people to become invested (literally!) in your work and your project's success. Finding Fernanda has been on Kickstarter for a little over a week now, and I'm continuing to spread the word through social networking and the occasional email. Folks want to help: I've been offered sources, introductions, and offers for future collaborations. The other amazing thing is all of the encouragement; people out there believe in this project as much as I do. Writing a book-length work is a solitary endeavor, and the support is so warming.  The Kickstarter experience has been incredibly positive.

Are there any potential downsides to tapping your social network for

money to support a project?

In the beginning, it felt really strange, almost like online panhandling. After the first day of being on Kickstarter, I had a moment of absolute terror over soliciting, and considered canceling my project listing all together. Talking about the Kickstarter concept of crowd-sourcing with friends also helped me relax about it. I asked two close friends, one journalist and one photographer, what they thought about the possible sleaze factor. Both independently pointed to the same thing: if the public thinks your project is worth supporting financially, that's a way of understanding your idea's relevance to society at large.

Perspective also kicked in: no one else out there is going to do this work. I'm not making money, let alone breaking even. I'm trying to get by in a media landscape that provides few opportunities and support for long-term investigative/ documentary projects.

Anything else you'd like to share?

I want to say a heartfelt thanks again to not only all of my Kickstarter backers, but to those friends, colleagues, and contacts who helped by reposting, retweeting, and blogging! You are all so wonderful. And of course, Finding Fernanda will be on Kickstarter until August 20, 2010- you can check it out at http://kck.st/c533wf .

The project's website is also currently housed at www.findingfernanda.com. I'm always open to ideas, suggestions, and collaborations, and can be reached at Erin (at) erinsiegal.com

Erin Siegal’s dual passions for photography and the written word led to an education patchworked between New York City’s School of Visual Arts, Harvard University, and Parsons School of Design. She earned a BFA in Photography from Parsons in 2006, and a Master’s degree in Investigative Journalism from Columbia University in 2009, where she was a Fellow at the Toni Stabile Center for Investigative Journalism.  Based in the Bay Area, Erin’s clients have included Human Rights Campaign, the New York Times, Reuters, the Urban Justice Center, RollingStone.com, the United Nations, and more. She was an Artist-in-Residence at the School of Visual Arts and the Camera Club of New York, and her work has been shown at the Jen Bekman Gallery.  A 2009-2010 Fellow at the Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism, Erin is currently working on her first book, which details corrupt practices and child trafficking in international adoption between Guatemala and the United States.

Eric Kayne's Arcade Fire Images Starting to Circulate

Client Eric Kayne recently shot the publicity photos for Arcade Fire's new album The Suburbs. The images are starting to circulate, most recently appearing on the cover of Billboard. They look great and I'm excited for when some embargoes are lifted and I can share the outtakes with you.

Images shot in a river on Win's property featured on the cover of French magazine les inrockuptibles

Hear two songs from the forthcoming album on NPR.

Goodbye magazines, hello crowd funding?

Long gone are the days when photographers could pitch a great story idea to a magazine and get a guarantee or a nice long assignment. It does still happen, especially with unique ideas that are topical, timely or controversial, but it's the exception to the rule. Crowd sourcing, and specifically "crowd funding", could be the new model to getting those stories produced. Photographers, journalists, artists and other creatives are tapping the buying power of their social networks to make their projects a reality. Through web sites like Kickstarter.com and ProjectSite.com, photographers pitch their stories to the world, raise money and hit the road.

Journalist Erin Siegal has raised over $3,000 to cover her expenses in Guatemala as she completes a two year long investigative journalism piece on corruption in the adoption industry.

Photographer Zoe Strauss has raised $4,000 to do a series on how the BP oil spill is affecting people in The Gulf.

Stan Engelbrecht and Nic Grobler have raised over $16,000 to turn their project on South Africans and their bikes into a photo book.

The great thing about this is you instantly have a built in network of people who care about your story. All those small donations add up and those people will follow your progress, tweet about it and post about it to Facebook. It's like having hundreds of people doing PR for you.

Another big plus is that once you are done with the story, you can take it to book publishers, magazines, gallerists and art buyers and show them, in a concrete way, just how dedicated you are to your craft. Telling someone you have a great project idea is one thing, showing them is another.

Lastly, putting your ideas together and preparing them for one of these funding sites will force you to really think through your project. You might just find, through a lack donations, that it's not the great idea you originally thought it was.

UPDATE: PDN just posted a very informative interview with Yancey Strickler, co-founder of the crowd-funding Web site Kickstarter. It include tips on why some projects exceed their fundraising goals while others don't bring in any money.

"Your Best Shot" series on The Guardian

Have you seen this series of photographer interviews on the Guardian's website called "Your Best Shot?" It's been around since 2009 but I always forget to check it out. Today they posted an intervew with Inez van Lamsweerde about what it is like working with her husband Vinoodh Matadin. I love that she says they want to spend as much time together as possible, and working together just adds to that time. I'd love to work with my husband!  Unfortunately I don't know much about Business Intelligence.

The picture shows Inez passionately kissing Vinoodh, who has been retouched out of the photo.  It symbolizes how debilitating it would be for her to work alone.  Read more at at The Guardian.

Previous posts include interviews with Lauren Greenfield, Ed Kashi and Elinor Carucci.

Thoughtful Advice to Young Photojournalists by Michael Kamber

Michael Kamber took the time to write a long and thoughtful post answering many of the questions he receives from photographers starting out. And as it always happens, people have chimed in with their own words of wisdom. Most of this advice is geared towards photojournalists.  Check it out at lightstalkers See more of Michael's work at http://www.kamberphoto.com